MoSoNe: Mobile Social Networks: 2 - Mind versus Theory

Which term to use: “mobile social networks”, or “mobile social media”? I used to think that the two phrases meant the same thing. But I've changed my mind. (I'm allowed to change my mind: it proves I've still got one to change.)

When I think of “networking”, I think of goal-oriented behaviour carried out by people who have a theory of the social space they are investigating. The theory in play may be complex, and it may be dynamic, but it is still a constricting force. Networking doesn't have to be aggressive, but it is always instrumental. When people network, they are looking to match other individuals against predefined criteria. Wherever you have matching, you have narrowing. That's why old-fashioned checkbox-based online dating, and to some extent newer-fashioned speed dating, are so good at helping people repeat their previous relationship errors.

But when I think of “media”, I think of bits of dialogue, of jokes, strokes, pix and li(n)ks. I hear conversation. And conversation is fluid. Even where conversation begins with an agenda in mind, it often strays into unplanned areas. Media enables and encourages undirected exploration, and co-discovery by members of a community. Those members don't define themselves by attributes; they reveal (and conceal) their interests through their engagements with others, and via the materials and observations they choose to share. The activity in the “social media” space is surprising and creative. When commercial interests infiltrate these spaces and try clumsily to assert their own agendas, they are quickly ostracised. Social media, then, is self-cleansing.

So, “mobile social networking” is for people with a theory, and “mobile social media” is for people who want to participate in an emergent, collaborative space. Mobile social media is, I believe, a new state of mind: a truly shared experience that its participants are generating and evolving moment by moment, message by message.